Funds

First fund for an emerging manager, launched in fourteen weeks

A two-person team with anchor capital from both US taxable and non-US investors, and no infrastructure at all.

14 weeks to first closeAnonymised · published with consent

The brief

Two portfolio managers leaving a larger firm had soft commitments from a US endowment, two US taxable family offices and a European institution. They needed a structure that worked for all of them and a launch date that matched the endowment's allocation cycle.

  • Mixed investor base meant a single-vehicle fund would have failed one group or another.
  • The manager entity had to be placed where the team actually lived and worked.
  • Prime brokerage onboarding, not the regulator, was the binding constraint on the timeline.
  • Budget was an emerging manager's, so nothing unnecessary could be built.
Structure diagram
Master-feeder built for a mixed investor base

Two feeders exist because the investors have different tax profiles, not because the strategy needs them.

Capital
US endowment
Tax-exempt
Needs a corporate blocker against UBTI where leverage is used.
US family offices
Taxable
Want partnership treatment and K-1s.
European institution
Non-US
Avoids US filing exposure through the offshore feeder.
Feeders
Delaware LP
US taxable feeder
Cayman feeder
Exempted company
Trading
Cayman master fund
CIMA registered
Single book, single prime broker, single track record.
Manager & service
Onshore investment manager
Where the team lives
Deliberately not in Cayman, so the Cayman economic substance test for fund management business does not apply.
Administrator
NAV, AML, registry
Prime broker
Execution & financing
How value moves
Subscriptions
Each investor enters the feeder matching its tax profile; both feeders subscribe into the master.
Fees
Management and performance fees charged at feeder level and paid to the manager under the IMA.
Compliance
Annual audited accounts by a CIMA-approved auditor, fund annual return, FATCA and CRS through the administrator.

How it was built, in order

  1. 01
    Structure fixed in week one

    Confirmed a master-feeder was genuinely required by the investor base rather than defaulting to it.

  2. 02
    Manager entity placed deliberately

    Investment manager established where the team actually works, keeping the Cayman fund management substance test out of scope.

  3. 03
    Documents drafted in parallel

    Offering memorandum, articles, IMA, subscription documents and administration agreement progressed together rather than sequentially.

  4. 04
    Prime broker started first

    Onboarding opened in week two, because it was known to be the critical path, not the regulator.

  5. 05
    Directors and auditor engaged

    Independent directors registered and a CIMA-approved auditor appointed ahead of registration.

  6. 06
    CIMA registration filed

    Registration under the Mutual Funds Act completed once the operator and audit appointments were in place.

Outcome
  • Fund launched in fourteen weeks, in time for the endowment's allocation cycle.
  • All three investor types accommodated without anyone taking an unintended tax position.
  • Manager entity sited so that no Cayman economic substance obligation arose on the management business.
  • Launch budget held, with no vehicle or service provider added that the structure did not need.